47
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by supersquirrel@lemmy.ca to c/techtakes@awful.systems

The tests were conducted in a controlled benchmark setting, meaning its usefulness in a true medical environment is up for debate. Still, Microsoft was eager to declare victory.

...

But the study could only imperfectly simulate the back and forth a doctor has with a patient by having DxO talk to a “gatekeeper agent” that “mediates all information requests drawing from the underlying case record.” Put another way, it’s an AI diagnosing a patient that’s played by an AI.

I wonder how many news outlets covered this breathless headline with the caveat that this was AI talking to AI being used to "prove" AI is better at diagnosing humans than humans.....

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jasoman@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Our LLM say our LLMs would not need that treatment. You human are disqualified.

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2026
47 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2763 readers
314 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS