view the rest of the comments
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on. Keep on-topic
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Biden had four years to deal with this guy and just didn't.
His friends and donors would’ve gotten implicated as well.
What's the point in honeypotting only one side of the political spectrum.
I don't know if I buy it was all a honeypot. I expect at least one state actor got their hands on compromising materials, but it doesn't seem planed out enough to be a honeypot the entire time
It'll be fascinating when the world can honestly review the facts to learn what all happened. Sad that can't happen until Trump and everyone around him is long gone from power
Epstein was the person running the honeypot. You don't have cameras set up all around your mansion and private island and safe full of CDs and hard drives with labels like {name + "young" name} for a one off job. He also had 2 official passports from different countries and no source of income to become a billionaire. He was state sponsored. His girlfriends dad was an obvious mossad agent.
would have been
Nah got to gotten
That works too.
shouldve replaced garland the moment he wouldnt do anything, but he knows garland wouldnt do anything about it though. there is more than likely plenty of Dems in the files too.
Plenty of big donors to the Dems. That's more likely who they were protecting.
The worst thing Biden ever did was refuse to push harder on Trump. He had four years to get one of the prosecutions (plural) settled, including the one where we have publicly released phone call recordings of Trump committing the crime. Yeah, the Georgia prosecutor fucked up, but they slow rolled it before the fuck up meaning there wasn't time to recover from the fuck up.
Biden also had four years to release the Epstein files, but he didn't. Even if he knew the prosecutions would not have been successful and was playing a political game of "we're doing this the right way and not doing a knee-jerk witch hunt," releasing the files in their full would have gotten this ball rolling in a very different DOJ and FBI environment. It also would have given the public more time to see the connections.
The classified documents was an open and shut case that they let the fucking judge slow walk the shit out of.
Please spell out which motions could have been brought to speed things up.
https://thelegalguide.org/how-get-judge-removed-your-case-recusal-disqualification/
Sorry, I'm not a lawyer. Do you think Cannon wasn't obviously in the tank for trump?
https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/what-does-the-law-say-about-recusing-judge-cannon
An attempt was made in a later case (partially based on conduct in this case) and was denied. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/29/trump-judge-aileen-cannon-assassination-case-deny-recuse.html
Any other motion suggestion that might've sped up the case?
Biden also got handed a court ruling saying the President can do literally anything he wants and he basically just shrugged at it
I love how this statement still gets downvoted, all these years later. Pure denialism, even in a community full of die-hard Trump haters.
Making a Federalist Society member the Attorney General was a very bad idea.
I want Jack Smith or Vanita Gupta to be the next AG.
Which is EXACTLY why he was Voted back in JUST like how we KNEW Trump was in the Files so DIDNT vote for Him again!