this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
182 points (89.9% liked)

Games

16796 readers
582 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
182
Starfield hasn’t hurt No Man’s Sky’s popularity – it may have even helped it (www.vg247.com)
submitted 1 year ago by geosoco@kbin.social to c/games@sh.itjust.works
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

No Man's Sky has had a great month, coincidentally around the launch of the other big space adventure of the day.

...

No Man's Sky has been one of the best examples of a video redemption story, and developer Hello Games never stopped expanding the game with new content, and more features. Just recently, the procedural space adventure celebrated its seventh anniversary with the Echoes update, and it doesn't look like there's an end in sight to this support.

But do these updates bring back players? The answer is an emphatic yes! Hello Games founder, Sean Murray, recently revealed that No Man's Sky is having "its biggest month in the last few years." Interestingly, this is happening across all platforms where No Man's Sky is available - so PC, consoles, Mac, and even VR.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.fmhy.net -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They would be very similar. if Bethesda was competent both games have lots of similar elements from, yes having ships to scanning resources on a planet to having a jetpack. So it is fair and understandtable to compare these games pretty much the biggest difference is that Bethesda not having seamless apace travel and I ain't letting them off the hook for "well they are just different games 🤓" bullshit.

[–] Nfntordr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm actually kinda glad it didn't have seamless space travel. I don't think it's entirely necessary. Colour me the 1%

[–] WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.fmhy.net 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This way space travel is reduced to fast travvel

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

Depends, of you're jumping to a system you have enough range/fuel for it is, it don't need to be scanned to enter the sector, sometimes your forced to go though other places you may want to avoid.

[–] Lycerius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You sound like you're in an abusive relationship with Bethesda.

[–] Nfntordr@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

What? Fuck off idiot

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Same here, it's impressive technically the first few times you see it in NMS, but eventually it gets old. Starfield loses nothing by not having it.