139

Republicans have spent an estimated $183 million on television ads focused on transgender-related attacks against Democrats in the final phase of this year’s midterm elections, betting that struggling GOP candidates can leverage the divisive cultural issue to overcome voters’ concerns about President Donald Trump’s leadership and the state of the economy.

The massive investment through Oct. 25 produced about 217,000 TV spots nationwide and exceeds the amount Republicans spent on similar ads in 2024, a presidential election year, at the same point before Election Day, according to tallies provided to The Associated Press by data firm AdImpact.

The spending campaign matched messaging from other Republicans on the campaign trail, led by Trump, who has played down surging gasoline prices and other rising costs, but highlighted what he described as an urgent threat to America’s children from Democratic policies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

It didn't "work in the past", that was republicans vs neoliberals.

Races where "just fix what we actually care about" wasn't on the ballot.

If there's an option to actually fix the shit that matters, that's going to be the winner over any position about who can play what non-professional sport for zero money.

Hell, the only reason anyone cares about it is, is fear mongering over college scholarships, we get free higher education and that knocks the legs out from the entire argument.

It's just neoliberals and Republicans don't want us to talk about that.

Progressives love talking about actual solutions though, which is why this bullshit doesn't work against them.

[-] UpAndAtThem@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I see some good signs (primarily DSA) of actual solutions based governance. I'm cautiously optimistic that the existing national dynamic will shift away from reality TV rage bait bullshit. If the fear mongering stops working overall, then there's a chance for real meaningful change.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

If the fear mongering stops working overall, then there’s a chance for real meaningful change.

What?

It didn't work in 2016, and it didn't work in 2024...

So in early 2025, the DNC pivoted away from neoliberalism...

The things you're talking about hoping may happen, happened almost two years ago...

[-] UpAndAtThem@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The idea that reactionary fearmongering rage bait identity politics weren't used or didn't have their intended effect in 2016 or 2024 is laughable.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

If the fear mongering stops working overall, then there’s a chance for real meaningful change.

You said that, I assumed about neoliberals...

I pointed out it didn't work and neoliberals lost 2016 and 2024...

And you seem to have taken it as no one was trying it...

Which, yeah buddy. If anyone said what you thought it might be "laughable" but that's only because you're not understanding what anyone else is saying.

On the other hand, I got a pretty good reason now on why you're 20 months late to the party. People probably have tried to you by now, hell I might have.

But I just don't think you're gonna understand it if you honestly don't by now

[-] UpAndAtThem@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Sounds like you made an incorrect assumption and now you're trying to flip it around to make a point that seems nebulous and standoffish. I'll just point you back to my original comment.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

And I'll do what I always do when facts and logic don't work.

Best of luck buddy, you'll need it to survive with this level of critical thinking and reliance on first assumptions

[-] UpAndAtThem@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

It stand by my statement. The idea that socialist candidates are immune from fearmongering hate based attacks is far from the new proven dynamic, and the USA still has a long way to go to put the politics of fear and hate in the past. Your rude, dismissive and pompous additude is proof positive. I think you should give more fucks.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 days ago

It didn't "work in the past", that was republicans vs neoliberals

This is literally still fucking happening you just love to deny reality

Progressives love talking about actual solutions though, which is why this bullshit doesn't work against them.

It's not, only against the neoliberals who still respond to these ads by throwing minorities under the bus

this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2026
139 points (99.3% liked)

politics

31633 readers
2379 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS