332
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2026
332 points (98.5% liked)
Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related
4579 readers
41 users here now
Health: physical and mental, individual and public.
Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.
See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.
Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.
Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.
Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.
Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
okay so i actually read the nyt article. she was an amazon employee, got put on disability leave because her epilepsy was worsening. then she got laid off just as she become eligible for a green card application... that's diabolical but what do you expect from amazon. so to not get deported she had to find a new job quick. and she was worried the epilepsy drug may interfere with her ability to do interviews....
literally pushed right to the edge of a cliff by the oppressive immigration policy and capitalism. and finally dealt a killing blow by an AI chatbot...
i don't know what to say? except that my blood is boiling.
Social Killings are a real thing.
Look up the term. We exist in societies that could easily fix these issues but actively choose not to.
Well, that's quite tragic but it seems to be more of a problem of the whole system around her layoff and immigration.
I also think that AI companies should be accountable for what their bots say but this story is way deeper than the headline suggests, anf the core problem wasn't that an LLM told her so, but that the system made her so desperate that she took the risk to rely on an LLM for information.
if she hadn't talked to chatgpt she would still be alive today. what are you even talking about.
And I didn't say something different. All I said is that if the system around her wouldn't have pressured her so hard, we wouldn't be there.
But, while we're at it, picture this: She asks a friend. "Hey, I'm scared that i won't get a job when taking this medication, and if i don't get one fast, I'll have to leave the country". The friend then says "maybe just stop taking it until you've got a job" without knowing better.
Then we would have exactly the same situation. Why? Because she was terrified and desperate.
And before you get that wrong: I'm not comparing talking to AI, to talking to a friend.
I'm picturing a realistic scenario that may alternatively have happened. Same background, same outcome, just a different trigger for the outcome.
The system fucked her, it's the cause. ChatGPT was just what loosened the hairpin trigger that could have been loosened by something else.
ChatGPT should be held accountable. It's not a friend that just didn't know any better and tried to comfort a loved one in an awful situation. But that wasn't what my original message was about.
I don't know what's the point of deliberating what "the cause" is. Everything that happened contributed to her death, and that's it. If a friend told her to stop medication, then that friend would be sued, too. Are you just try to fit this tragedy into your narrative so you can hang your slogan on it?
And secondly, if you can't see ChatGPT as a simple extension to all the problems "the system" you kept talking about have, then you are blind. AI is a spectre that is haunting this world - a spectre of capitalism.
Yeah nah. Fuck that.
Your country needs organized labour
Especially in the suppressed white collar, which is really just light blue collar jobs like coding or marketing.
Evil at all levels !
All of the info you just parroted is literally in the 3 or 4 paragraphs in the subtext you see first when coming to the comment section....
Given that 99% of commentors are proven to not actually click through to the article, they're doing God's work here.
Yeah makes sense cause that's an excerpt from the article which op read