939
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

AN UNPRECEDENTED LEAK of Department of Homeland Security records has exposed details of more than 41,000 employees or contractors who work for the department and its constituent agencies. The records include email addresses, phone numbers, and office addresses, but also references to internal systems and sensitive information on undercover and surveillance programs. In all, the leak provides a map of how DHS is organized and how it operates.

The records, which span DHS itself as well as seven component agencies, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement and US Customs and Border Protection, were last updated on August 19, 2026. The transparency nonprofit Distributed Denial of Secrets and cybersecurity researcher and journalist maia arson crimew previewed the data to WIRED, which they say they obtained from a group calling itself the Department of Peace.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Tango@piefed.ca 132 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It seems to me that ICE would be far better off conducting its business in such a way as to not be worried about being publicly identifiable. Regular police officers are able to do their duties without masks and with the requirement to display their badges, and I dare ICE to claim that regular police don't do work as dangerous as ICE.

Obviously undercover work is the exception, but when the entirety of ICE goes around masked, they'd be fools not to expect an overcorrection.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 70 points 3 days ago

Regular police are still generally unaccountable thugs

[-] Tango@piefed.ca 78 points 3 days ago

Which makes it all the more crazy that ICE feels that it needs additional unaccountability beyond what already covers cops for so much.

[-] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 22 points 3 days ago

It's because they know they're an authoritarian paramilitary group and they are doing things that they could personally be tried for treason if their side ends up losing, like they always do eventually.

They don't want to be personally identifiable if possible, because at any point someone could decide to Kirk them when they're not in their goon squad at work.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago

Deporting people to unrelated countries to be imprisoned or enslaved should open them up to trials in The Hague.

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

Don't give them too much benefit of the doubt, more than a handful in incidents where standard beat cops are quick to hide their badge numbers when being legally recorded by innocent bystanders

[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Just heard a report that said essentially there are more local law enforcement doing the job than actual ICE agents.

maybe we should treat locals like ice not the other way around? also, don't call them local. they don't live in the places where they enforce. say municipal.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

and I dare ICE to claim that regular police don’t do work as dangerous as ICE.

Oh I can literally guarantee what ICE agents do isn't nearly as dangerous as what regular cops do. The only real danger ICE faces is self-induced by wearing masks to remain unidentifiable while they terrorize American citizens. Their jobs would be even safer than they already are if they weren't acting as a rapist's gestapo.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

There is no reason for undercover ICE operations, period.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

ICE isn't just supposed to be Nazi gestapo rounding up people the President is tarelgeting as a political distraction.

There is a place for undercover investigations of smuggling and human trafficking rings.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah, and ICE isn't that place. ICE was created in the after math of 9/11 as a way to address the "terrorism" threat. It has failed spectacularly at the actual job they were created to address.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

No disagreement that they've failed in their mission and have become a tool of fascism, but conceptually there's a place for an investigative law enforcement agency specializing in immigration and customs. Having undercover assets investigating human trafficking and smuggling would be appropriate as a part of that agency's activities.

It should still be abolished, of course. ICE is irredeemable at this point.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

We have the CIA, FBI, NSA, and a number of other three letter agencies that can do that. ICE has no need to exist, and we did just fine before it was created.

this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2026
939 points (99.6% liked)

News

39833 readers
2020 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on. Keep on-topic


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS