view the rest of the comments
LocalLLaMA
Welcome to LocalLLaMA! Here we discuss running and developing machine learning models at home. Lets explore cutting edge open source neural network technology together.
Get support from the community! Ask questions, share prompts, discuss benchmarks, get hyped at the latest and greatest model releases! Enjoy talking about our awesome hobby.
As ambassadors of the self-hosting machine learning community, we strive to support each other and share our enthusiasm in a positive constructive way.
Rules:
Rule 1 - No harassment or personal character attacks of community members. I.E no namecalling, no generalizing entire groups of people that make up our community, no baseless personal insults.
Rule 2 - No comparing artificial intelligence/machine learning models to cryptocurrency. I.E no comparing the usefulness of models to that of NFTs, no comparing the resource usage required to train a model is anything close to maintaining a blockchain/ mining for crypto, no implying its just a fad/bubble that will leave people with nothing of value when it burst.
Rule 3 - No comparing artificial intelligence/machine learning to simple text prediction algorithms. I.E statements such as "llms are basically just simple text predictions like what your phone keyboard autocorrect uses, and they're still using the same algorithms since <over 10 years ago>.
Rule 4 - No implying that models are devoid of purpose or potential for enriching peoples lives.
Except that recreating code is legal. Or at least, broadly and in itself, fully legal. That's why you have game clones and they exist just fine for decades (civilization clones, VCMI, etc etc).
Just because it's legal doesn't mean the AI providers won't tweak their models to limit your ability to (re)create whatever they don't want you to (re)create.
Nothing stops them to introduce artifical boundaries. They will probably start charging fees to lift certain limitations at some point.
Eh, that's exactly what this post is about. Maybe I just don't understand your original comment.
Or maybe I interpreted your comment wrong. Now I see it also can be interpreted as "yeah but recreating code is legal (and shouldn't be banned by Claude Code because of that)". Probably what you intended.
The quote needs to be updated to reflect that we will still need to write all the software, inconvenient to them, manually.
Exactly! We're in agreement then