224
"Come and take it"
(lemmy.nz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2026
224 points (98.3% liked)
Fuck AI
8793 readers
616 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
Rules:
- Relevant posts only.
- No bigotry.
- No misinformation.
- No NSFW/NSFL content without being labeled NSFW or being in an appropriately-labeled spoiler tag.
- This isn't a place to talk about the cons and (supposed) pros of AI for different use cases. This is /c/fuck_ai .
- Especially no AI advocacy.
- No AI-generated content. If you want to post examples of AI failing hillariously, there are other communities for that like !ArtificialIgnorance@lemmy.ca .
- Venting is part of the purpose of this community, but don't aim frustration or accusations at other users.
- These rules are a living document that may change in the future.
You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.
Effective reports:
- "The third image is a well-known anti-semitic trope"
- "Claiming that 'agentic AI' can outperform humans at all jobs is misinformation"
Less effective reports:
- "Breaks rules"
- "Misinformation"
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Thats not a great analogy
A gun doesn’t obfuscate your accountability
It would be more accurate of my argument to say “carbombs are weapons, cars are not weapons”
Neither of those analogies cover the element of obfuscating accountability tho, which again, is what they are using the AI to do.
You do not need AI to blow up a children’s school.
You use the AI so you can say “oops, i didn’t mean to triple tap that children’s school, the computer told me it was terrorists”
The fact that AI obfuscates responsibility doesn't actually change its role. AI trained to pick targets are obviously weapons.
They're just autonomous weapons, or maybe more similar to mines. Set it and forget it! If they walk on the mine, that's their fault.
My understanding of the way theyre using it is that it is not directly in charge of munitions.
Which is to say, the AI does not fire the missle, a human fires the missle. That human is (theoretically) able to dodge accountability because they just pretend to believe what the AI says is completely accurate.
Imagine a sniper rifle with a thermal scope. The scope is detachable, it can be used without the gun, but not as a weapon. The gun can be used without the scope, as a weapon, and has other methods of target acquisition available (iron sights if nothing else).
When you look through the thermal scope you see a heat signiature, but it obfuscates if the target is an enemy or a civilian. So using the heat scope allows you to pretend that you thought the civilians you murdered were actually enemy combatants.
A mine doesn’t need a human to detonate it, and the powers that be are not (yet) psychotic enough to give control of the weapons systems to the AI.
I'm still not sure how you're getting "doesn't count as a weapon" from that.
A thermal scope that obfuscates the target sure as shit seems like it's a weapon designed to kill civilians.
The scope is not a weapon, it doesn’t have to be attached to the gun, and can be used non-violently without a gun.
The gun does not need the scope to function, and the gun essentially only functions violently.
Do you think a plate is food?
A gun needs a bullet to function. It can not be used as a weapon without a bullet.
Therefore, guns are not weapons. Guns are plates.
Aight, you’re either a troll or incredibly dense, so I’m out