35

And as the satellite passed over Svalbard, Norway, the orbiting AI model responded over the downlink:

Blue marble below,

Data streams in silent grace,

Starlight feeds my core. ✨

Those roughly 20 tokens would cost about $0.000012 if generated through the Google Cloud API, based on Gemma 4 26B's pricing of $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens, excluding input costs.

Add in a satellite weighing perhaps 500 kg, based on the mass of SpaceX's Starlink satellites, and a retail launch price of around $7,000 per kg, and you have a very expensive haiku.

This is the most astronomically far from art as you can get.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago

The only "benefits" for Google (or whichever evil company) is that they don't have to fight the public for land, and they can tell their idiotic investors that they're doing something in space.

Everything else is a drawback. The lack of easy heat dissipation means they can't cram much into it, and likely have to manage load to not overheat the hardware. It's not repairable if something on the hardware level dies. LLMs already make no money, and sending these to space means it loses even more (like the article states).

this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2026
35 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2776 readers
167 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS