191
submitted 1 day ago by lavenie@lemmy.zip to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bumblebeer@lemmy.world 33 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

What! You mean the bioaccumulating micro particles are not totally harmless? I'm shocked! Shocked I tell you.

What's next? Are you gonna tell me water is wet, or fire is hot?

Don't get me wrong, having the empirical validation (along with a mechanism) is nice, but this should cone as a shock to absolutely nobody.

[-] grranibal@lemmy.zip 19 points 22 hours ago

Honestly I remember hearing that plastic molecules are stable and inert, I thought microplastics wouldn’t cause problems beyond accumulating and “clogging”

[-] spankysalmon@fedinsfw.app 12 points 20 hours ago

I mean... fiberglass and asbestos are actually chemically inert, yet they'll still fuck you up good. It's a bit silly to think any foreign contamination is harmless.

[-] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

Lead has a very stable nucleolus. Forever chemicals (PFAS) were named that because they were stable. CFCs were pretty harmless too until we learned about ozone layer.

Anything that industry makes and distributes in large quantities throughout the world is pretty bad because by the time we learn about long term impacts, it's everywhere

[-] spankysalmon@fedinsfw.app 4 points 18 hours ago

but remember the mantra of these cretins for the past century or few; "the solution to pollution is dilution!". Never mind all the demonstrably terrible effects of quite a few things in the parts per billion/trillion...

[-] Photon1c@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

Well, not that shocked.

Are you gonna tell me water is wet, or fire is hot?

Oh god you’re going to make me “ackchually”

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 22 hours ago

If water makes things wet, and water is surrounded by more water is that water not also wet? 🤔

[-] Photon1c@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

I think wetness has to be a solid surface with liquid sticking to it, and since there is no surface, there is no wetness.

One exception though, ice can be wet (and of course extremely dangerous if it is)

[-] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Ice is a form of water, ergo water is wet^•

^• ^some ^conditions ^may ^apply

this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
191 points (99.0% liked)

science

29731 readers
547 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS