39

Tribunal vice-chair Eric Regehr said in the latest decision that he was reversing the fine, and that X had a valid defence under a section of the intimate images law that states an internet company is not liable if it "has taken reasonable steps to address the unlawful distribution."

What a motherfucker

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

X should just be shut down, or the tube should be tied coming into Canada. Than Canada should follow the EU rules for charges.

this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2026
39 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12625 readers
617 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


🌐 Other Relevant Communities


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Provide sources when making a claim. Do your research or google it doesn't cut it. The one making the claim is responsible for backing it.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS