184
submitted 5 days ago by Stamau123@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

US drama The Pitt is similar enough to medical series ER for a lawsuit against its producers to progress, a court in the US has ruled.

The widow of Michael Crichton, who created ER, argues The Pitt is effectively a reboot of the series, which has been made without proper permission or credit.

Sherri Crichton says her husband's contract included a "frozen rights" provision that prohibited any spin-offs, sequels or reboots of ER being made without his express consent.

A three-judge panel said there are "clear and numerous similarities between The Pitt and ER," which means the case can go ahead. Warner Bros previously described the lawsuit as "baseless" and sought to have it dismissed.

Listing the similarities between the two shows, the court cited the emergency room setting, the fast pace, use of medical jargon, graphic depictions of injuries, and younger doctors fresh from medical school being trained.

"We find the details here suffice for a prima facie case," the judges said.

It means the case will now go to a jury trial in Los Angeles Superior Court.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ch00f@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

They could have chosen not to cast Noah Wyle. I legit thought it was a sequel to ER.

[-] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

That's kinda like saying Michael Imperioli couldn't take a role as a mob boss because he played Christopher Moltisanti and that would make it a Sopranos spin-off.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Or Lorne Michaels suing every show Pete Davidson is in for being Pete Davidson in the show.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago

Well the secret there is that all of those shows and movies are actually produced by Michaels' production company and he's not gonna sue himself.

[-] ch00f@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Sure. Just providing an outside perspective. I haven't watched either show, and that's the connection I made.

[-] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Right, but Allison Janney and Bradley Whitford were both in The West Wing. Now they're both in The Diplomat playing characters in the White House. But that doesn't make the Diplomat a sequel to the West Wing.

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

It would make me think so at first. Like, I wondered if Rob Lowe was going to get involved when I read that Janney and whitford were doing a political drama together.

It’s not enough to win the case, but I absolutely agree that there’s enough there to bring the case.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 5 days ago

If you watch enough television shows you will see actors that used to work together working together again.

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Yes, but same actors and same topic is less common. Hence the “at first.”

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 5 days ago

So an actor is only allowed to be in one show and then they have to retire?

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2026
184 points (95.5% liked)

News

40039 readers
3167 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person or their instance. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on. Keep on-topic


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS