512
submitted 15 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

In academic discourse, use of the correct name is an important means of establishing professional credibility. For example, if within the fields of computer science and information science, a specific term of art, such as artificial intelligence, has gained widespread acceptance, the use of an alternative term—a term, like superintelligence, not widely accepted within the discipline—would seriously undermine the credibility of academic work (and the author’s more general standing within the field).

Donald Trump has notoriously attempted to rechristen the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America.” So too has he attempted to rename Lake Ontario to “Lake America,” and he is threatening to fashion new MAGA names for an ocean, a major river, and the state of New Mexico. Trump also recently signed an executive order requiring all federal government programs and communications to use the terms superintelligence and S.I. rather than the broadly accepted nomenclature artificial intelligence and A.I. One might shrug all of this off and say, “Well, so what? It’s a free country, and all of us can still use the generally accepted names of places (Gulf of Mexico) and things (A.I.).”

Unfortunately, after Oct. 1, 2026, this is no longer the case for academics at state-sponsored colleges and universities in Alabama. H.B. 2 officially bans the use of the phrase Gulf of Mexico by any and all state employees. As a professor at the University of Alabama School of Law, I find this appalling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dou9m@lemmy.ca 45 points 15 hours ago

People still think this is the land of freedom lol. I’d guess 70% of Alabama doesn’t care about this, how far off am I as someone who hasn’t gotten to experience the people IRL?

[-] BuckFutter@timeyak.com 19 points 14 hours ago

Florida passed a similar law, but I am yet to meet a serious person, emphasis on serious, that actually calls it gulf of america. Only the die hard bootlickers are on board with this. In an unrelated irony, the locals are also set to sink the SS united states, a historic vessel, in the gulf of Mexico (america for the idiots) in the next week. The timing is very apt.

[-] dou9m@lemmy.ca 6 points 14 hours ago

Isn’t the SA United thing a good thing tho lol? Was under the idea it would be a huge artificial reef / rec diving spot?

[-] BuckFutter@timeyak.com 11 points 14 hours ago

It is and it isn’t. It has cost millions to purchase it, tow it, store it and clean it and now is under a pending injunction from a federal judge that may prevent it from sinking as the plaintiffs alledge the USACE didn’t follow the proper protocols to issue the permit modification since the vessel is on the national historic register. Its a shit show. Im all for artificial reefs, but this is just dumb.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Whole lotta grifters sold shirts to dipshits related to "gulf of america" (lol) but yeah no one outside the biggest of buttkissers calls it that.

[-] BuckFutter@timeyak.com 1 points 6 hours ago

Oh yah they did, tons of stupid flags too. But then again these are the same idiots that flew flags saying trump won in 2020.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Seeing all the people with trump 2028 hats and shirts on The Good Liars is quite wild.

I think a lot of it is about in-group reverse-virtue signaling, but JFC.

I wonder how many of these idiots wear that stuff in public - places where they don't necessarily know they'll be surrounded by lots of other cult members? I bet it's close to zero.

[-] BuckFutter@timeyak.com 2 points 2 hours ago

Yah in a deep red state, there are a few. The positive sign is that in 2024 there were trump stores everywhere selling that cheap Chinese merchandise crap…they are no where to be found now.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I live in the Denver area, so I guess I'm lucky. I have not seen anyone wearing that gear in quite some time. Even early on in 2016-2017, only rarely seen even then. I few people flying flags at their houses, even now. But no shirts/hats. Probably not brave enough, honestly.

Maybe a handful of locals were wearing the gear out in the early days. But even his supporters seem to realize that others view it like wearing a Klan robe in public...

I remember seeing some kid around 2018 or 2019 wearing one of those stupid hats. He was an Asian teen/early 20's. Not sure if he was confused, wearing it ironically, or what. I did notice he was getting open stares.

[-] Pavidus@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

I live in Alabama, but I can't say I have an answer for you. It just doesn't come up. People usually just say "the gulf."

That being said, most people that interact with me know that we don't see eye to eye. This means most hot topics are left alone.

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2026
512 points (99.4% liked)

politics

31775 readers
4362 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS