161

Donald Trump admitted that his immigration policy has been "too tough," and he's willing to work with Democrats on it going forward.

The post Trump Stuns 60 Minutes Correspondent by Admitting His Immigration Policy Has Been ‘Too Tough’ first appeared on Mediaite.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Trump almost seems like the type that would flip his principles in a heartbeat if he personally felt that he’d look more popular because of it. Given their whole shtick fell so hard now in 2026 I wouldn’t be surprised if he starts trying to spin being “for” some more popular issues.

Although he cares about personal enrichment over perceived popularity as well. So who knows what happens next.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 19 hours ago

He has no principles

[-] obviouspornalt@fedinsfw.app 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

if by "look more popular" you mean "be less likely to die in prison after an espionage conviction", then yes, I agree with you.

[-] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago

I have some doubts that he even considers a possibility of investigations leading to any convictions for him. His ego wouldn’t allow him to worry about that I feel.

Personally I could see him passing Medicare for all of a single payer system if his ego was stroked right. Fun fact I hate egotism so much this is legit a borderline foreign concept to me, the only reason I know its possible is because he is so egotistical that I legit can't assume any other reasoning besides avarice and greed.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

I mean realistically it's pretty likely anything longer than a three year sentence would have him die in prison.

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2026
161 points (97.1% liked)

politics

31821 readers
3150 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS