view the rest of the comments
Linux
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
Its important to remember that the vulnerabilities always existed, we just know about them now. We have no idea how many of them were being quietly exploited before now.
There is no point being mad at AI for the avalanche of CVEs, if anything we should be mad ourselves for not prioritising security review of the code. Many of these issues probably could have been found before AI if we as an industry were willing to spend the resources doing the audits. But we werent willing, and now we have to pay for our sins.
you should listen to GKH's review of the recent dumps of "CVEs" because you clearly don't know what you're talking about
Care to summarise?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_MwMLPmMccs
I'm halfway through this, I assume that its what you mean? Nothing there so far invalidates what I said. 25% bad reports means 75% good reports.
Edit: I finished it, and nothing he says invalidates what I wrote.