269
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RedSnt@feddit.dk 62 points 4 days ago

In a perfect world we wouldn't even need licenses, or just use BSD style ones, but alas.. And thus moving to a copyleft license is the best move for sure.

[-] misk@piefed.social 47 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

AI bubble has shown that if you don’t have billions of dollars for lawyers, your IP will be copied and compressed into an LLM and you won’t be able to do anything about it, regardless of license. But at least Apple won’t be able to profit from Asahi team work and BSDs won’t be able to use drivers from Asahi. So much winning.

[-] Axolotl_cpp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 4 days ago

Apple is an asshole company, if they wanted community contribution for their drivers, they could've made their stuff open, now they can go fuck off, full stop

[-] misk@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Given the state of Asahi right now I don’t think Apple would be interested. It’s enough for some enthusiasts willing to sacrifice some things but by the time Asahi approaches function and performance parity that hardware will be commercially irrelevant. What does this even achieve in the age of license laundering with LLMs?

[-] Axolotl_cpp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It achieves that someone cannot just do a 1:1 copy and redistribute it as closed source.

[-] misk@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago

People do it with LLMs all the time now. Just tell machine to rewrite it in another language to wash away the license.

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2026
269 points (99.3% liked)

Opensource

7012 readers
89 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

⠀


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS