269
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lime@feddit.nu 10 points 4 days ago

can't be. if there is gpled code in the training data, all code must be gpl since the model is one work. and since it can't, that's a breach.

[-] rollerbang@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah, in theory. In practice, good luck proving it.

[-] entwine@programming.dev 5 points 4 days ago

I hate seeing this kind of doomerism around AI discussions. A future where we have no rights is not inevitable.

We know for a fact that OpenAI, Anthropic, Google etc trained on GPL code. They haven't claimed otherwise, and this isn't something they're trying to hide.

We also know what the various open source models were trained on, since they're open source.

We can pass laws that require LLM providers to disclose their data set in some way, eg through independent audits. Trump is the one who didn't want AI regulation, and he basically just lost all ability to make that a reality. The final six weeks of the pedophile congress isn't likely to accomplish anything on that front, and even if they do, the incoming congress can reverse it.

This is the time to energize people, not complain on the internet.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 4 days ago

the question is if that theory is enough for a general ruling.

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2026
269 points (99.3% liked)

Opensource

7012 readers
89 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

⠀


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS