269
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2026
269 points (99.3% liked)
Opensource
7012 readers
89 users here now
A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!
⠀
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
And how does a copyleft license get in the way of that? On the contrary, with the GPL, I can be sure that the technology and code will be freely shared. Freely as in freedom, that's the whole point.
I misunderstood your initial point, I thought you were speaking against permissive/copyleft licenses generally. We agree with one another. Except in the "I can be sure that the technology and code will be freely shared" because just as bad actors can abuse a permissive license, bad actors (see: companies with enough money to just squash the legal case) can simply ignore a copyleft license. I think we 99% agree though and I love copyleft.
You are right, but with copyleft you at least have legal mechanisms to force the company to comply with the license. With MIT or BSD there aren't any, because permissive licences don't enforce any such restrictions.
Yup. And I love copyleft too.
Those legal mechanisms do exist in theory! But, as ever, if its you vs Microsoft, you can probably get fucked :(
Permissive is the opposite of copyleft. Permissive is "here's my code, do whatever the fuck you want", copyleft is "here's my code, you may use it but if your derivative work is available to other people then I dictate how it must be licensed"