293
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2026
293 points (100.0% liked)
Fuck AI
8774 readers
1777 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
Rules:
- Relevant posts only.
- No bigotry.
- No misinformation.
- No NSFW/NSFL content without being labeled NSFW or being in an appropriately-labeled spoiler tag.
- This isn't a place to talk about the cons and (supposed) pros of AI for different use cases. This is /c/fuck_ai .
- Especially no AI advocacy.
- No AI-generated content. If you want to post examples of AI failing hillariously, there are other communities for that like !ArtificialIgnorance@lemmy.ca .
- Venting is part of the purpose of this community, but don't aim frustration or accusations at other users.
- These rules are a living document that may change in the future.
You can help the mod team by making your reports detailed.
Effective reports:
- "The third image is a well-known anti-semitic trope"
- "Claiming that 'agentic AI' can outperform humans at all jobs is misinformation"
Less effective reports:
- "Breaks rules"
- "Misinformation"
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Voice likeness is a legit slippery slope. More than one person have the same tone of voice.
It is more about AI based voice replication that people sounding similar.
YouTube won't really care which it is when it gets the take down request though.
That is a good fucking point. Of course, it would be trivial for YouTube to do the tiniest amount of due diligence, but they won’t unless they have to.
So this means they delete all poor people's accounts, and only reverse it for rich people
Also appearance because doppelgangers are a thing.
Though these aren't examples of slippery slopes but just exceptions to the normal expectation (that everyone is unique). A slippery slope is something that supposedly creates a trend that, if followed to the end, would supposedly result in obviously bad rules being implemented. Eg, "If we reduce the drinking age from 21 to 19 today, tomorrow they'll want to reduce it to 17, and eventually 5 year olds will be old enough to drink!" They are logical fallacies because the current step doesn't imply any future steps will happen or any trend will be followed beyond the current change.