109
DC Studios: James Gunn, Peter Safran Step Down
(www.hollywoodreporter.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2026
109 points (100.0% liked)
movies
4113 readers
134 users here now
A community about movies and cinema.
Related communities:
- !television@piefed.social
- !homevideo@feddit.uk
- !mediareviews@lemmy.world
- !casualconversation@piefed.social
Rules
- Be civil
- No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
- Do not spam
- Stay on topic
- These rules will evolve as this community grows
No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Idk, it seemed exceedingly obvious to me.
Yeah, she spent the whole movie demonstrating how the things she went through led her to bad choices which led her to becoming a person she didn't like. She didn't want to see that happen to others. It didn't mean she had magically been fixed at some point along the way. Traumas often don't heal themselves with just time. Sometimes you really need therapy, and Supergirl spent the whole film running from the therapeutic influences in her life. It's only after everything else that she decides to stop running and come in out of the cold. It's kinda weird that people are ignoring all that and whining about Supergirl's lacking morals.
I wish I and everyone else had gotten to see the movie that you did. Because what we saw was something different apparently. All of that was anything but obvious as far as the movie goes. You largely have to assume that, or the character comes off as unlikable. It would be the only way to rationalize everything that happened.
There is an old adage in movie making. It's a visual medium. Show, don't tell. A lot of movies make the fatal mistake of dumping a lot of lore or information in boring exposition. Somehow this movie did one worse. They didn't even attempt to tell. Just assumed that everyone would rationalize. Yes, the rationalization was obvious. But that's still bad writing.
An extra ten minutes on the runtime for a couple extra scenes and some tweaked dialogue would have taken this from a muddy, confusing mess. Into a solid triumph. I enjoyed the movie. I enjoyed the original Supergirl as well. But the writing did this one in, despite doing Kara better as a character. Was just so sketchy in places.
Incorrect.
...in your opinion. Which is not shared by several others in this thread who seem to have understood it just fine.
Why do you think the character must meet your definition of likeable for the movie to be good? Don't answer that to me, ask yourself and then think about the answer you come up with.
You not getting what was shown does not mean you weren't shown. The showing occurred and you either didn't get it or are pretending you don't get it because you don't like the message.
...been an artistic compromise to satisfy the lackluster attitudes of the lowest intellectual denominator among moviegoers. Plenty of movies to suit that mindset are made every year. Stop insisting every movie be dumbed down to suit you.
Have a nice day. Byebye now.
I understood the movie just fine. It's legitimately the reason I can point out that there was bad writing.
You are arguing against a statement or claim I never made. And there are just as many people here who share my views, whatever that means.
My experience is the same as yours... I just saw this movie a couple of months ago and I am having a hard time remembering anything about it
I remember her on a dirty bender, somehow she got over it... comes back home
Yes, I watched it on Friday on HBO myself. I enjoyed the movie and understood it as someone who read comic books etc, their whole life. But I absolutely understand a lot of people's criticisms about the writing and the overall baffling nature of it.
It's a common enough comic trope that it's not a mystery why so many people are post rationalizing it into the movie. Where it really wasn't. The whole origin story are bit was just confusing too. They didn't even do that for the Superman movie before this. They figured everyone knew it and just went with the character.
It was a well done sequence and overall enjoyable, but it's necessity and placement was just confusing. As it didn't really explain or justify directly any of the things that were going on. Or even tie in to the previous Superman movie. It would have been the perfect point to flashback to an inciting event that sent Supergirl on this path. Not as perfect as just opening with it and not confused drop in mid drunken bender.
yes I would not say it was a disaster by any means and it definitely looked great. I just found the plot weak.
I didn't get that feeling that I understood the character and believed she actually went through an arc. It felt more like she was partied until she was partied out and then went home.
Because Kara said "don't kill for revenge it isn't worth it" without ever establishing a reason for having that worldview through an establishing scene ir even a throwaway line of dialogue? Convictions like that really need to be shown in some way and Kara's actions throighout the movie are of someone who has zero issues with causing death so why would she be so adamant about revenge killing specifically?
The writing for the movie was terrible.