view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
I'm not suggesting anything at all except that sports are not so sacred that we need to literally legislate the issue at a government level for the same reason we don't have laws about Candyland.
Apparently we do, and there are potentially millions of dollars in sports, and while fairness and equality may not be important to you they are to me, and trans people I feel violate that. I also believe in a sanctity of sports and place a high value on competition where we all agree on and can follow rules while doing something physical and having fun, I believe learning those skills are central to society.
You are seriously suggesting that your feelings about sports are a reason for the government to restrict the freedom of a minority. Why does our society have to conform around your incorrect beliefs?
No, I'm saying that they stated that lean muscle mass doesn't affect overall athletic ability, which is absolute horseshit of the highest tier. The best predictor of physical ability has always been lean muscle mass, and I cannot find why they concluded that it wasn't a significant factor. So my conclusion is it's political.
Thankfully this is the position of most sports professionals and those that dictate the rules. Also Washington made the sane choice on the ballot too.
You are now suggesting that all the researchers are working together for political purposes and intentionally coming to the wrong conclusions about the data. Again, your proof is you feel that the researchers must be wrong.
If you feel so strongly that you are correct, go prove it. Go collect the data, do the research, and prove that all the other researchers are partisan hacks who are pushing a political agenda. Until you have proven your spurious claims, society is under no obligation to conform to your feelings.
See here's the thing. I don't have to. I have a degree in Exercise Science. I know lean muscle mass percentage by weight is the best predictor for physical ability. So why these researchers conclude it isn't without explanation is frankly entirely beyond me. I can't find anything on why they concluded that way and it flies in the face of basically what I know and have studied. And when the conclusion doesn't support the data like it does in that study I have to wonder what politically motivated reason there is for that.
You are rubbing shoulders with flat earthers and anti vaxxers. "Scientific concensus must be wrong because I said so. They tell me I'm wrong, but I know better. Why do they keep saying the Earth is round when I can see the flat ground? They must be politically motivated." You're doing the Dr. Oz, claiming that the anti-vaxxers have legitimate concerns that need to be seriously invesitgated and we really need to stop taking vaccines in the meantime because I'm a doctor so you can trust me over scientific consensus.
No actually I'm not, and this is my last comment since you're too stupid to understand, clearly. Those researchers said lean muscle mass is not a predictor of athletic performance. That is not the scientific consensus of the field period. Their statement goes against science.
Strongly believe it, just like body dysmorphia is no longer considered a psych illness, yet all trans options are still done through a psychologist. There most certainly are politically motivated aspects to that as well.