this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
283 points (97.6% liked)

Selfhosted

40329 readers
423 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Appears to be Hetzner for now, wouldn't be surprised if all VPS get affected eventually.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

ITT: People who don't use Plex proudly talking about how they don't use Plex.

This move makes sense to me. They could be liable for what's hosted in the cloud, and on top of that you can't pay for access, and the host is known as a great place to let people do that.

I really don't understand the people who use jellyfin but insist on shitting on Plex. You can both use jellyfin and not also not be smug about it. It's the same reason people are tired of the Linux user or back in the day why android users were so annoying.

[–] Molecular0079@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They could be liable for what’s hosted in the cloud

Liable for something hosted on someone's private VPS? That's like saying Apache or Nginx is liable if someone uses it to host a torrent site. I don't really buy it tbh.

I really don’t understand the people who use jellyfin but insist on shitting on Plex.

I think people are allowed to critique and express disappointment over a product that they paid for. Just because you personally don't care about the direction of Plex doesn't mean other users can't express their valid viewpoints. Plex at one point said they didn't really care what people put up on their private servers and now they're dialing that back and essentially asserting control over what people already paid for. People are right to be upset.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s like saying Apache or Nginx is liable if someone uses it to host a torrent site. I don’t really buy it tbh.

Tell that to your company's team of lawyers who are telling you just to take it down. Even if it's a grey area legal will tell you just to be proactive and avoid the whole thing. Plus like I said, charging for access is against ToS anyway, and most hosters who do that use this cloud service. Few bad apples spoil the bunch as they say.

and I'm cool with valid viewpoints, but god is everyone in this thread saying the same lazy thing. "Plex is trash, I dumped it, get Jellyfin". Like okay, I get it, can we not have 98% of the thread talking about Plex just saying "It's trash". At least some of them have valid criticism you're talking about, and I'm all for that, but I'm just over the pure vomit that most of these comments are. You're criticism is valid and makes sense, the lazy comments just saying "lol I switched to Jellyfin" are just annoying to me. Great, high five to you.

[–] tortina_original@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't say, someone else's opinions /comments are annoying to you?

I suppose the correct solution is to ask everyone else to not post what annoys you, right?

[–] KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the point was, if you're not actively adding to the discussion, and instead are just giving the whole"kek, I use jellyfin", then rather stfu, it's already been said 100x in the comments.

[–] tortina_original@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a nonsense point.

You are assuming that everyone reading the topic knows everything you do. People don't.

The very reason I am using Jellyfin is because in some Plex thread on reddit, months ago, random people said something along the lines of "Lol, you should have used Jellyfin".

I knew that Plex was (although I did not use it myself) so I went to see what Jellyfin is. Once I saw what it does (amazingly well) and how simple it is to setup, I set it up. I am an old fart, I don't have time to follow everything anymore so I truly did not know about Jellyfin.

And that's the story of how I found out about Jellyfin. By someone loling in the tread about Plex.

But hey, everyone should just do what the guy upstairs want, so he doesn't get upset.

It is reasonable.

Okay, so how many times does it need to be said in one place? I'm counting 60 here right now.. I'm pretty sure after the first 10 comments you'd have picked up on it.

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

Agreed. They're trying to kill off Plex Shares, where people are essentially using their software to run their own for-profit streaming service using pirated content. This shit affects all of us as it brings on lawsuits and new laws to combat just so some random dude can make some extra cash selling access.