43
submitted 1 day ago by fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cocorio@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

This whole article reads so strange. Why are we calling a 24 year old an Eagle Scout. Why was he at the same bonfire as a random 16yr old. How are they gonna make felony charges stick for something that doesn’t exactly seem like a malicious assault( just a dumbass) why were there 3 witnesses who saw him do it, then proceeded to stay by the fire.

[-] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 2 points 12 hours ago

The Eagle Scout designation in your 20s is crazy work. It comes off like a guy who puts his Masters degree abbreviation in his email signature, when he's 46.

Fuck you Derek, you sit in a cube all day and have been in the workforce for decades. Nobody cares you have an M.A. in Communications.

[-] Taldan@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

Even stranger is their phrasing:

Schnee, who has served as an Eagle Scout [...]

"Served"? The article is acting like it's military service

He's a grown man who permanently maimed a teenage girl due to his own recklessness

[-] Carmakazi@piefed.social 7 points 23 hours ago

There is an internal narrative in Scouting that achieving Eagle Scout is a significant life accomplishment that carries respect throughout your adult life, so some people feel compelled to bring it up whenever. Some things I've heard:

  • the police may give you some leeway like its a PBA card.
  • the military will automatically consider you for higher rank upon induction
  • it will always be a positive on a resume.

Of course, at the end of the day it's a youth organization, and bringing up your youth accomplishments past your first interview or college application should be embarrassing at best.

In this case I think it's just short for "someone who should have known better than to throw random bullshit in a bonfire."

[-] Taldan@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

it will always be a positive on a resume.

Having done hiring before, I can definitively state that is false

If someone decided to use their limited resume space to include Eagle Scout, I would view it negatively. It means they had nothing else relevant they could add

So at a minimim there is at least one interviewer for which it is a negative. Can't speak for everyone though

[-] CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago

Same. As someone who stands up and runs whole departments, being an Eagle Scout is a minor detail akin to the location of your high school and if you try to pump that up as a qualification I don’t care.

I also say that as someone who was in scouts up to life scout and consciously decided the troop leadership was BS and eagle was meaningless.

[-] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 4 points 22 hours ago

The eagle scout rank also displays leadership capabilities due to the project you have to organize. Putting it on a resume isn't going to hurt anything.

[-] Taldan@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Or that one of your parents do

When I was in scouts, there were a lot of kids that had their parents doing 90% of the work

[-] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

That one is on the scout masters. Mine wouldn't let you progress to the board of review if you didn't do things yourself.

All my Mom did was show up and helped with snacks and water, while answering construction questions (she used to build houses for habitat for humanity).

[-] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

It was a shock absorber, which is a cylinder filled with oil and compressed gas. It seems to me like you don't pick a shock as random bullshit because you likely know it's an explosion risk covered in warning labels. They come with instructions on how to drill them before disposal. That'd be my guess as to why they're going with such motivated charges.

Or, the victim's family is connected to the judiciary system

Or, because it's the USA, assigning a perpetrator is the only way to get someone's health insurance to pay out. Ever hear of them suing themselves? It's to force insurance.

this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2026
43 points (92.2% liked)

News

40039 readers
3167 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person or their instance. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on. Keep on-topic


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS