937

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has accused establishment Democrats of treating her “like shit” as progressive activists urged her to run for president in 2028.

In a 100-minute long video posted on Instagram, the 37-year-old congresswoman from New York said that the party had a “remarkable opportunity” to pass left-wing policies after the midterm elections. She also accused the party’s leadership of starving funds from left-wing candidates during the campaign.

“There’s this huge conversation about candidates that were under invested in,” Ocasio-Cortez said. She cited Angie Nixon, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America who came within 240,000 votes of flipping Florida from red to blue, but ultimately lost to the Republican candidate Ashley Moody.

“If Angie Nixon had just had a little bit of that support, that outcome could have changed. But that money has to come from somewhere and it comes from these people,” Ocasio-Cortez said in reference to the party’s Senate leadership.

Reflecting on the period after she was first elected to Congress in 2018 at the age of 29, Ocasio-Cortez accused senior Democrats of being “horrifically cruel” to her. “I mean I was treated like shit,” she said. “Everybody took a swing at me.”

The Bronx congresswoman is seen as the likeliest progressive candidate to run for the Democratic nomination for president in 2028.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 80 points 5 days ago

AOC as presidential candidate would prove some interesting things about the voting populus, but it would also bring some interesting things to light about the current state of the power the wealthy hold.

The old DNC could try hard to oppose her. But there isn't a single Democrat with name recognition on her level.

They can't argue against her policy stance in a way that people would support a competitor.

They could argue against her age and experience, but I think the voting populace doesn't give a fuck about that anymore. They could result to other personal attacks like her being Puerto Rican, or a woman.

The GOP would result to scare tactics that, apparently, have finally lost their edge.

What I'm curious about isn't the stuff we see in the news. Trump and the oligarchs would stop at nothing to prevent her victory. The ultra rich never had nearly as much wealth and power as they do now, and a lot of people conveniently died as they became too popular.

[-] LemmySuxNow@reddthat.com 46 points 4 days ago

Dems exist to stop leftists. They do it over and over.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

That's a confusing take.

That worked in 2016. That didn't work in this election. The current DNC chair started his career as an intern working for Paul Wellstone.

Are you suggesting we just do... nothing?

[-] Malica@lemmy.zip 24 points 4 days ago

We need to harass our reps until they lose the will to live. Be loud, be annoying and most of all be persistent. Tell them what you want clearly, for example, i don't want schumer and jeffires in leadership positions, so I'm focusing on that. Also give them an alternate path to vote for, like instead of voting for schumer, please vote for Chris Van Hollen. Then do it again the next day. Phone calls preferably.

[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Just shouting out Joe Neguse as an alternative to Jeffries. He stopped taking aipac money, he's generally progressive, already in leadership in the house, and he is black, so it keeps the implicit promise to the congressional black caucus to elect a black speaker.

It's not about race, it's about Jeffries.

[-] Malica@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago

I'll look into him, he sounds promising

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

The article literally discusses how Democrats helped Florida stay red.

[-] LemmySuxNow@reddthat.com 4 points 4 days ago

Why do you think it didn't work? A few leftists managed to sneak through, but they succeeded in blocking many more in the primaries.

[-] skibidi@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

I'd personally rather see her jump to the Senate for a term, or NY Governor, before trying for the presidency. I'd say the same for any House rep. Governors and Senators have the clearest parallels to the office, as executive and foreign-policy roles themselves.

I think AOC is a high-variance candidate - much the same way Trump was in 2016 - and she will either get much more or much less support than expected in the general election.

I think her biggest electoral baggage will be her statements over the years on the 'Woke 1.0' items that the electorate soured on. She has moderated her past statements here more recently, which leaves a lot of doubt as to her actual beliefs and policy goals. She'll be attacked for that from the left and the right, and it will take oxygen away from a progressive economic agenda that would likely be broadly popular if explained well.

Whoever the dem candidate ends up being, I doubt they can rely on the same level of support as the party received in the midterms. 2 years is an eternity in politics and 2028 will likely be defined by some new crisis that isn't even on our radar right now. If she runs, I'll likely vote for her (at least, based on who else seems to be running as of now).

[-] Malica@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago

We simply don't have time, we're in need of that once in a generation leader right now and she's the best we've got.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'd personally rather see her jump to the Senate for a term, or NY Governor, before trying for the presidency. I'd say the same for any House rep. Governors and Senators have the clearest parallels to the office, as executive and foreign-policy roles themselves

only one sitting house rep has been elected president. ONE. garfield, in 1880. a 9-term rep, and at that time he was already chosen by his state legislature to be a senator.. so like a 'senator elect' today.. which he declined when he won his presidential campaign.

[-] criscodisco@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Might I remind you, we elected a twice-impeached, pedophilic reality show star. I think we are well past historical precedents, here.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2026
937 points (98.3% liked)

politics

31898 readers
3988 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS