938

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has accused establishment Democrats of treating her “like shit” as progressive activists urged her to run for president in 2028.

In a 100-minute long video posted on Instagram, the 37-year-old congresswoman from New York said that the party had a “remarkable opportunity” to pass left-wing policies after the midterm elections. She also accused the party’s leadership of starving funds from left-wing candidates during the campaign.

“There’s this huge conversation about candidates that were under invested in,” Ocasio-Cortez said. She cited Angie Nixon, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America who came within 240,000 votes of flipping Florida from red to blue, but ultimately lost to the Republican candidate Ashley Moody.

“If Angie Nixon had just had a little bit of that support, that outcome could have changed. But that money has to come from somewhere and it comes from these people,” Ocasio-Cortez said in reference to the party’s Senate leadership.

Reflecting on the period after she was first elected to Congress in 2018 at the age of 29, Ocasio-Cortez accused senior Democrats of being “horrifically cruel” to her. “I mean I was treated like shit,” she said. “Everybody took a swing at me.”

The Bronx congresswoman is seen as the likeliest progressive candidate to run for the Democratic nomination for president in 2028.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Malica@lemmy.zip 60 points 4 days ago

I remember Pelosi especially was vicious. AOC didn't get brave again for a year + after that shit. Great point about Angie, she would have won with minimal support. We need to form a 3rd party, enough is enough.

[-] protist@retrofed.com 42 points 4 days ago

How about taking over the Democratic Party? That process is already underway, let's keep it going

[-] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 27 points 4 days ago

Nah, take over the Democratic party from the inside. Like the tea party did, which paved the way for maga inside the Republican party. Without first fixing our voting system, third parties do nothing but harm

[-] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

The tea party did that with the blessing and funding of oligarchs. Leftists don't have oligarch funding.

[-] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

Did that stop leftists from taking power on November 3rd?

The people outweigh the money, as long as we are organized.

[-] bampop@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I agree with you in principle, but the tea party was an astroturf movement so a very different situation. A progressive takeover of the Democratic party could get much more ugly. That majority the Dems now enjoy, includes DINOs like Fetterman, and centrist/establishment types like Schumer and Pelosi. They are facing an existential threat to their kind of politics (the kind where you sell your soul to corporate donors and AIPAC). If push comes to shove, I wouldn't be surprised if they side with the GOP, choosing to scupper the Democratic party rather than work with a progressive agenda.

I want it to happen, just don't expect it will happen without a hard and dirty fight. The powers behind the political establishment do NOT want this.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

We need to form a 3rd party, enough is enough.

"How Republicans Never Lost an Election Again: The Realities of Vote-Splitting"

[-] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago

The Democratic Socialists of America are seeing a surge in political power over the last few election cycles. The DSA alone now has over 130,000 active, dues paying members.

Why the fuck should we throw that all away now?

We can take over the Democratic party, and in doing so, push the Right-wing Democrats to the Republican party and eliminate the current GOP altogether. There is a future where we permanently shift the Overton Window left.

Y'all want to kneecap progress when we haven't even gotten started yet.

[-] bss03@infosec.pub 9 points 4 days ago

Might I suggest the Working Families Party instead of forming a new one? Just make sure to take into account the realities of FPtP voting, if your district hasn't implemented a better system.

[-] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) as well

this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2026
938 points (98.4% liked)

politics

31898 readers
3988 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS