116
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2026
116 points (99.2% liked)
Linux
15451 readers
338 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
You're clearly not bothered by the grift if you're using the billionaire's products.
Oh, well, aren't you smart...
I also use Amazon. I buy my groceries from my region's local monopoly. I have a Facebook account (that I only use for marketplace). I also pay taxes, a portion of which goes to killing poor brown people for some reason...
Yes, I exist in a capitalist system and consume thusly when it benefits me to do so. Just because my money goes somewhere doesn't mean I like the people whose pockets it goes into. I prefer using local models for most of my low-hanging-fruit LLM needs, but frontier models have their place, and their uses, and so I have a subscription (which I've shifted around a few times).
also really not a big fan of the major chip manufacturers and brands, but I have a computer filled with the things. If you want to open up a fab or a frontier lab and can compete with them on quality and even get in the ballpark of them on price, and aren't a fucking Nazi, I'd be more than happy to use your product instead. However, here we are.
P. S. I also bought a Nestle chocolate bar the other day, and they're basically a manifestation of satan. It is what it is...
Some things are a requirement to function in this capitalist society, but using slop generators isn't one of those things. You do you though.
Neither is the chocolate bar, but yum.
Personally, I like things that improve the quality and enjoyment of my life. But agreed; to each their own.
The billionaires lose money each time you use their stuff. We should drain them as much as we can.
I don't think that's actually the case. A lot of people say that, but inference is absurdly cheap, even compared to "api-subsidized" subscription prices. Where the math doesn't work out is the fact that they're training new models all the time. Any individual generation of model, if they were to just stop on it, (I suspect) would be profitable. But when you factor in continuous R&D and training costs of chasing the next gen, they're just hemorrhaging money.
But that's the game they're playing because they don't actually care about selling a product to customers; they care about investors. Nobody gets rich anymore by making a product and selling it to people. They get rich by making a product and then pitching it to investors and then getting bought out by a bigger fish or going public and having a big IPO.
The way the economy works now is that the companies are the products. Or at least their shares are, for a time...
I don't think inference is breaking even with the rapid depreciation of the chips, etc. but they don't let us see any of those finances for some reason.
But I take it back about using it as much as possible. Those CO2 emissions are inexcusable.