118
submitted 12 hours ago by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Rather than banning AI tools in development, the correct approach is to change how submissions are handled in open source projects.

What kind of recommendation do you have here that doesn't devolve to, like, closed source?

Open source requires a community that is transparently involved in the process and have equal rights to fork the code. There's really no way around this, the license grants the right for anyone to fork as long as they adhere to the license.

Sad truth is that AI has effectively killed open source unless maintainers are willing to make a clear stance for AI:0 submissions only. Otherwise, the endless pull requests are far too hard to maintain as a single individual. And we certainly don't want code being accepted by AI systems without human certification, especially in something as fundamental as an OS kernel.

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2026
118 points (99.2% liked)

Linux

15451 readers
348 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS