75

The FreeBSD Project published its Q3'2026 status report on Tuesday that outlines a number of development initiatives to ongoing work around an AI policy for this BSD operating system.

FreeBSD polled their developers on the usage of AI and LLMs as a hot topic for the quarter. An overwhelming 88% want the FreeBSD Project to adopt an AI policy. 35% of those polled want AI-assisted code to be disclosed while 22% felt it should be treated just like any other code contribution and only 16% want AI generated code to be rejected outright. 65% of the respondents were in favor of AI-generated documentation with human review.

FreeBSD has established an AI working group to work on drafting an AI policy. Final reports are expected in Q4.

FreeBSD developers have also had to spend a lot of time preparing for the EU's Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) such as around Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) support.

FreeBSD has also seen work on a GUI for the Bhyve hypervisor written in Freepascal/Lazarus. This Bhyvemgr GUI is coming along well to help in managing of Bhyve VMs:

https://www.phoronix.net/image.php?id=2026&image=bhyvemgr_med

Meanwhile on the web management/UI side, Sylve continues looking quite slick as a unified system management platform for FreeBSD from the web browser. Adding in the past quarter were new storage options, data center / cluster features, and more.

https://www.phoronix.net/image.php?id=2026&image=sylve_med

FreeBSD also continues seeing work to enhance desktop installations of the operating system and more polishing of the desktop experience. Related have also been more suspend/resume and audio stack improvements.

Some other FreeBSD happenings include improving zoned storage support, debugging enhancements, a variety of scheduler improvements, and enhancing the bootloader.

More details on these FreeBSD improvements made during Q3 can be found via FreeBSD.org.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Imnebuddy@lemmy.ml 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

So originally this comment suggested an alternative to FreeBSD that takes an Anti-AI stance called CoffeeBSD. It's specifically a fork of FreeBSD 13.0, which is a bit odd since the untainted commits to FreeBSD occur in later versions. It removed the lua bootloader interpreter and added a few md files and hasn't received updates in a few months. I suggested this as I thought it would be interesting to keep an eye on, but as for now it seems yet another fork with not a lot of support and could likely die off. It's created by a contributor of the AI-less fork of vim, EVi, as well as other projects.

35% of those polled want AI-assisted code to be disclosed while 22% felt it should be treated just like any other code contribution and only 16% want AI generated code to be rejected outright.

I find it depressing that many developers don't want to even bother taking the time and care to disclose when AI assisted some code contributions. I'm tired of most software eating its own tail and not taking precautions in case legal issues occur which would lead to reverting the AI assisted commits.

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2026
75 points (98.7% liked)

Open Source

50074 readers
306 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS