207
submitted 12 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Kansas state Sen. Cindy Holscher (D) was projected to win the state’s gubernatorial race, according to Decision Desk HQ (DDHQ), keeping the office in Democratic hands and denying Republicans one of their best pickup opportunities this year.

Holscher defeated Republican Kansas Senate President Ty Masterson, who had President Trump’s endorsement, to succeed term-limited Gov. Laura Kelly (D). She notched just more than 50 percent of the vote, while her opponent garnered 49. 6 percent as of Wednesday afternoon.

Her victory extends Democrats’ hold on the governor’s mansion in a state Trump carried by roughly 16 points in 2024. Kansas has repeatedly elected Democratic governors, including Kelly, who won competitive races in 2018 and 2022.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 23 points 11 hours ago

True Democratic control of states means gutting the Electoral College is on the table.

Second to that, Democrats can actually gut the filibuster now with a simple-majority vote, now that a one-off traitor Sinema-like defector can't block it.

This will force Trump to veto, oh say, Medicare For All.

Some real power is there. Whether Democrats use it is another story...

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Gutting the fillabuster is a terrible idea. They don't control the presidency so whatever they pass will recieve a veto. I understand that it would force Trump to do it, but I just don't think it will resonate in a way that will change anything

Then if Republicans regain control somehow there's no fillabuster to slow them down like there has been.

The time to remove the fillabuster would be if they reclaim the presidency and hold the house/senate. Then they could ram through popular reform that should prevent Republicans from winning next cycle, but removing the fillabuster now is a huge risk with a small chance of reward. People just don't see failing to pass a bill as success, unfortunately too many voters only respond on what they feel at home. Not what politicians tried to do. It's shortsighted, but that's the reality

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

I’m just happy PA finally has a democratic Congress so we can legalize weed

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

NJ and NY are going to lose out on a lot of free tax revenue though

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Good luck, friend!

I think Texas is going to do the same, and when that happens Democrats need to repeat the fact that blue states were the trailblazers of legalization.

People still don't grasp how big of a deal that has been, and a clear win for Democrats.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Nah, Dems are fucking squares and won’t be proud of something like that.

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2026
207 points (98.1% liked)

politics

31873 readers
2635 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS