9
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2026
9 points (62.9% liked)
Open Source
50092 readers
578 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
Am I right that those smaller commits and branches are not in the public repo though? Some commits also mention they close issues but those issues also do not exist in the repo? E.g.
https://github.com/secninjaz/OctoLab/commit/796e859c7165b6d4543f1491e0dd5fde169d8d2d
What do these refer to?
Yes, those are not on public repo, github releases mention that although its not mentioned in readme.
That refers to development and fix cycles over days/week and then squash-merged into a release. Those are worked on an internal gitlab repo so they're not on github but release notes include full changelogs.
To avoud confusion, maybe I should exclude issue numbers from changelogs unless they're from github issues.