this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
23 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

3925 readers
1 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Scottish research team believe they may have produced the "holy grail" alternative to palm oil.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vettnerk@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Christ, that article was hard to read, with 90% of it dedicated to the importance of palm oil, and random ads making you believe the article is finished. So, here's the part that matters:

Food experts at Queen Margaret University (QMU) in Edinburgh say their new 100% plant-based ingredient is 70% better for the environment.

And with 80% less saturated fat and 30% fewer calories, they are also hailing PALM-ALT as a significantly healthier option.

Catriona Liddle, one of the lead developers on the QMU team, said: “It’s the holy grail to replace it and still have exactly the same end result in product – to taste the same and have the texture the same – and we’ve done that.

“We’ve put it through some special sensory testing to see if a panel can tell the difference between our product and traditional palm shortening, and they can’t.”

The new PALM-ALT product is described as having a mayonnaise-style consistency.

It is made from a by-product from the linseed industry, plus natural fibre and rapeseed oil.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So they're replacing sfa and mct with omega six pufas? Barf.

[–] PlantJam@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The applications of this type of product wouldn't care about any of that. If anything the improved macro nutrients (decreased calories and saturated fat) would be seen as an improvement. If this is truly a 1:1 replacement like the article is suggesting, it could be huge.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe it wouldn't be harmful for cosmetics (I don't know) but it would for food. A true replacement would need to approximate the fatty acid profile, not just throw a bunch of inflammatory industrial waste in for cheap filler.

load more comments (2 replies)