this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
542 points (94.3% liked)

News

23387 readers
3545 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

President Joe Biden will announce the creation of the first-ever federal office of gun violence prevention on Friday, fulfilling a key demand of gun safety activists as legislation remains stalled in Congress, according to two people with direct knowledge of the White House’s plans.

Stefanie Feldman, a longtime Biden aide who previously worked on the Domestic Policy Council, will play a leading role, the people said.

Greg Jackson, executive director of the Community Justice Action Fund, and Rob Wilcox, the senior director for federal government affairs at Everytown for Gun Safety, are expected to hold key roles in the office alongside Feldman, who has worked on gun policy for more than a decade and still oversees the policy portfolio at the White House. The creation of the office was first reported by The Washington Post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Literally every modern handgun and rifle is semi automatic, save for skeet shooting break-action shotguns and some revolvers.

So? My point still stands. It's designed to kill as fast as possible. It should be banned.

I will always take the side of our school children and a safe society over guns. More guns do not create safety, they exacerbate violence. Most other developed countries do not have this kind of violence, and they do not have the easy access to weapons designed to kill as many as possible as fast as possible.

[–] astral_avocado@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

So? My point still stands. It’s designed to kill as fast as possible. It should be banned.

So you're calling for virtually all guns to be banned then except for shotguns and revolvers?

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm calling for any weapon that's designed to kill as many people as possible in as little time as possible to be banned.

[–] astral_avocado@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And that's 99% of weapons, because what's what guns do, they all kill things with a single trigger pull. You're asking for a de facto ban and that's absolutely a losing position.

And that's not even to mention that your position effectively means "I only believe the police and the military should have guns". Because that's what would happen.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

Personally, I wouldn't mind a complete repeal of the 2nd Amendment, but knowing that's a ways out, I'm just going to call for a ban on weapons specifically designed to kill as many people as possible in as little time as possible. And, no, that's absolutely not 99 percent of all weapons.

[–] Narauko@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To quote Benjamin Franklin here, "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Anyone is free to relocate to those other developed countries you mentioned if they do not want the burden of their own personal liberties and rights, but stripping those rights from everyone else in the USA doesn't fly well here.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anyone is free to relocate to those other developed countries you mentioned

Not true. You obviously know nothing about immigration to other countries.

[–] Narauko@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Last I checked the USA wasn't on any country's immigration blacklist. You still need to have some kind of useful skill for a work visa, and there are unique costs to international moves, but it's far from illegal to move away from the US. Additional costs if you want to renounce your US citizenship instead of holding dual citizenship wherever you move to, but that's a personal decision there unless you move to a place that requires renouncing citizenship as part of gaining it like the US does. Unless you were conflating free as is freedom for free as in no cost, but that would be silly given the context where this entire discussion thread is about freedom.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Lol. This is just not how it works. There are an excessive amount of obstacles for a US citizen who wants to move to another developed country. Most Americans who want to leave are completely stuck here.