this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
425 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59549 readers
3216 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Carter@feddit.uk 105 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How do people think paying for a service and still being served ads is acceptable?

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hulu has a lower price tear that includes ads. It makes it more affordable for some people. If they had started out with ads I would be less upset, but for a big company like Amazon it just seems like they're trying to make even more money off of the consumer.

[–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago

Hulu DID start out with ads. When they launched it was an entirely ad supported service. Hulu+ didn't come until years later. After several years of running two tiers of service, free ad supported and paid ad free, they dropped the free tier. Now, years later, we're back to ads with Hulu, but this time you pay for the privilege.

[–] MinusPi@yiffit.net 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

People lived with it for years with cable.

[–] Carobu@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cable started out without ads too. That was why you paid for it.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cable wasn't really a thing here in the UK, we're not primed for their bullshit.

[–] BlytheSason@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sky has a shit ton of ads.

[–] aeternum@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

i see what you did there.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Right, but the business model is totally different. You're paying your cable provider for access, you're not paying to watch the TV shows. The TV shows were financed by broadcaster advertising revenues among other streams of income. With Amazon, you're paying for access and to fund their programs. Ads are just greedy and anti-consumer for a vertically integrated platform like Amazon Video.

[–] PlatinumSf@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago

To be fair, Prime Video has always just been a free perk attached to prime (and with all the other 'perks' combined you could basically consider it free). For example I get an extra 3% back on all my Amazon orders by being a prime member. At the current cost of prime and just with the home supplies I order w/ subscribe and save, it pays for itself. That's not to say I'm happy with this, but in actuality they're fairly well positioned with the product to make this move and have most of the user base be merely disgruntled.