this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
641 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

58535 readers
4289 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the only way I would go about it. Maybe in the future if I really want it but really, the more tech, the more vulnerabilities. I'm fine with manually turning things on and off even if it's self hosted.

[–] cosmic_slate@dmv.social -4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ultimately, it’s just a light bulb. If it gets breached for whatever reason then it’ll a minor annoyance with someone blinking lights until you flip the physical switch off….unless you have a light-sensitive condition I guess.

[–] LrdThndr@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, no. Ultimately it’s a tiny computer that happens to produce light when a certain gpio pin is enabled. The light bulb is the portion you see, but inside, it’s an internet-connected microcontroller. I’ve even seen smart devices that internally run a full Linux distro complete with a shell session you can access if you know what you’re doing.

The problem is that some of these firmwares and/or exploits for these firmwares actively scan your local network and report things. Further, they can be used as a jumping off point for attacks deeper in your network.

[–] cosmic_slate@dmv.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At some point you have to define which threat vectors you’re willing to accept. Yes, in theory you’re correct. A device could ship with exploits for wifi targeting most access points or Bluetooth cards I guess.

So this device hops on my network, downloads a payload to break into my computer and finds…. PDFs of my tax returns, where most of the important data is already exposed and associated with my name? Worst case, tries to log into my bank accounts but is stopped by 2FA requiring a hardware token?

The bigger threat is the device wanting on my wifi or wired network, not some Zigbee bulb that has to conceal a wifi radio.

[–] LrdThndr@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And what about the zigbee hub, assuming you didn’t know enough to use homeassistant or some such?

Or a wifi bulb?

Point is, consumer smart electronics don’t have the same attention to security paid to them.

Fwiw, I’m not anti-smart device. I run HA and have all kinds of smart crap, so clearly I accept at least part of the risk.

But saying “it’s just a light bulb” is disingenuous as best.

[–] cosmic_slate@dmv.social 2 points 1 year ago

I’d be far more worried about a personal computer getting compromised before believing a Philips (or other mainstream hub) was popped.

Is it possible? Absolutely. We don’t know how secure these place’s software supply chain is.

I’m confident keeping it at “it’s just a lightbulb”, at least Zigbee bulbs, because the attack vector for this would take so much effort for it to be effective.

Sure, if you’re in a high-risk category, like if you live in an authoritarian state and you’re the popular candidate espousing democracy, I’d completely agree and say trash all of your wireless devices.

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The LIFX bulbs announced your WiFi password to anyone who asked. This is not a breach of the bulb itself, it’s a gateway to your LAN.

[–] cosmic_slate@dmv.social 1 points 1 year ago

Hue bulbs use Zigbee, not wifi.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago
  1. I don't want to be annoyed

  2. It opens up another vector for attacking other sensitive devices on my network. I haven't segregated my network so I don't feel safe doing this.