this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
80 points (100.0% liked)
Michigan
841 readers
459 users here now
Si quaeris peninsulam amoenam in braccas mea vide
🫴
✋
Banner photos credits
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think this is a smart move on Fain's part. The dealers will be fine without new product for a few weeks (thus not pressing the companies to end the strike). No parts for their very profitable service departments is going to piss them off royally. That will help the cause.
Dunno.
Are you going to buy a union made car in the future if you can’t get your car repaired because of a strike?
This could backfire.
Well, I will because I'm on the worker's side here. This may be the deciding factor for a small slice of car buyers, but I think most people are already on one side of this issue or the other. I believe the pressure from the dealers outweighs the potential lost customers, especially if it expedites the resolution.
I am down for unions, but I haven’t always been down for UAW. Granted, the current President is supposed to be different from UAW management of yore. However, I don’t get why a person who’s two weeks in should get the same pay as someone who’s 7 weeks in. I also don’t like the fact that they are screwing people over who already bought union made cars.
They targeted their most profitable vehicles. Why are repair parts second on the list? Why not target some other part of the process so new development will be impacted? Impact the companies, not consumers.