Asklemmy

43968 readers

1093 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

142

If you could give 10 years of development time to up to 10 software projects, which would you choose? (programming.dev)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by starman@programming.dev to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

102 comments fedilink hide all child comments

You can choose up to 10 software projects.
Each project receives 10 years of development time as if all the programmers worked continuously for that duration, following their current working methods.
After choosing these 10 (or less) projects, everything else remains unchanged in the world, as if time has been frozen for 10 years.

Which projects do you choose?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] corbin@infosec.pub 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If I’m thinking about projects that could benefit the most from an exponential increase in active developers:

Wine/Proton (could have a fantastic windows runtime on every *nix platform)
ReactOS (lot of potential for a windows 7/10 upgrade path)
Mozilla Firefox (would help with API parity with chromium)
GIMP (but only if they agree to change the stupid name)

The rest goes to package managers and other lower-level projects that don’t get enough of a spotlight, maybe Brew or Curl or something.

[–] fred@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

API parity for Firefox meaning, implement Chrome's proprietary crap, or are they actually lagging on web standards? Last time I checked was admittedly a while ago but I thought ff was the leader for standards compliance.

[–] corbin@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago

There are some useful APIs that Firefox is missing compared to Chromium, like Web Share or Web Bluetooth: https://caniuse.com/?compare=chrome+117,firefox+117&compareCats=CSS,HTML5,JS,JS%20API

[–] franzfurdinand@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

ReactOS is one I haven't heard about in quite a few years. That one would be really cool to see get a lot more dev time.