this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7224 readers
385 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

court records did not show any previous charges against the alleged suspect

Which is the problem when you use the argument that “law-abiding citizens” should be allowed to own guns. Everybody is law-abiding before they are caught committing a crime. Their first offence could be a murder using a gun.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

honestly, their first offence will be negligent homicide for leaving a gun around. Show me someone who needs a pistol just laying around and I'll show you someone with unresolved control issues.

[–] Tehmains@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do we know that he legally owned the gun?

I didn't see anything saying he had it legally.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I'm saying the same argument applies to everyone. Legal gun owners with no criminal record also shoot and kill innocent people. You cannot predict who will and who won't use a gun in a crime.