322
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 years ago

I think it's comical to be concerned about Trump with a gun. This is just a circus.

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 52 points 3 years ago

It's not being concerned about him with a gun, it's the blatant law breaking out in the open making a mockery of our laws and enforcement

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 31 points 3 years ago

He's going to test his fifth avenue hypothesis.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago

Fine with me as long as he does it completely alone.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 8 points 3 years ago

Honestly? I might actually vote for him if he kills himself before the election

[-] Gilles_D@feddit.de 2 points 3 years ago

How can you vote for him then? What happens if a person on the ballot is dead?

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago

Enough votes for a dead candidate to win may be converted to a phylactery through a dark ritual known only to certain necromancers in a D.C. pizza restaurant's basement. They take a break from animating Mitch McConnell for a few minutes, cast a spell and we get a lich president.

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago

The most likely answer if a dead person wins the presidential election is that the vice-president-elect becomes president. There are, however other possibilities.

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-donald-trump-constitutions-elections-us-supreme-court-91ce484b8046e6a555e172f42c4441f9

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago

It's happened, too lazy to search for the politician that won after dying.

[-] idiomaddict@feddit.de 1 points 3 years ago

I would do it as a protest vote, but not if it means the vp gets it 🤢

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 3 years ago

I don't think people should be allowed to get away with breaking federal laws on national television.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago

lolbruh, welcome to post-2016.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 12 points 3 years ago

He's doing it simply because he was told he couldn't and he knows his base eats up the whole "rebel against the government" schtick. Which is ironic because they're also, ostensibly, the party of "law and order", i.e. cop-sucking.

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago

As if he doesn't already own several? I'm pretty sure I read something about him carrying a .45 regularly, but that was a few years ago.

But sure, if he wants to stack another felony on the pile, go right ahead. Whatever gets him into prison more quickly.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 8 points 3 years ago

He only carries shit. If he carried a gun you'd see it stuffed into his diapers.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 6 points 3 years ago

Dude couldn't maintain eyeball discipline during a solar eclipse.

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
322 points (96.5% liked)

politics

31115 readers
3199 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS