this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
104 points (98.1% liked)

Excellent Reads

1478 readers
1 users here now

Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.

Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.

Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.

Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.

Rules:

  1. Common Sense. Civility, etc.
  2. Server rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kadu@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Without artificial selection, the few bacteria capable of digesting some plastics only do so when it's the only source of carbon and energy. Plastics require expressing complex enzymes and the process is not efficient.

If you have literally any other sugar available in your environment, it's better to digest that instead. So they aren't out there absolutely massacring plastic waste, unless they happen to be in an environment where this is all that's left.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if they could be bred to be unable to directly metabolize sugar, or if that's a ridiculous thought.

[–] Daefsdeda@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Easily. But then they would be outcompeted by bacteria that can.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Unless they have a sole niche they alone can occupy, like prevalent plastic, maybe.