Linux

48323 readers

695 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r

130

Thoughts on RHEL going closed source ? (mander.xyz)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz to c/linux@lemmy.ml

134 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I’m curious about what you think on how it will affect the Linux community and distros (especially RHEL based distros like Fedora or Rocky).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fruitywelsh@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 year ago (4 children)

More detials found here: https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream?sc_cid=701f2000000tyBjAAI

Seem more accurate that their public repos will be closed, so now only centos-stream will be public. You will still have full access to source through their developer program or as a paying customer.

[–] ulu_mulu@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Thanks, by reading "RHEL going closed source" first thing I thought is that would violate the GPL license, but the article you linked seems to indicate that's not the case.

CentOS is basically RHEL without Red Hat commercial stuff, so sources will still be freely available, just not directly from Red Had, am I understanding it correctly?

[–] _HR_@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

CentOS is basically RHEL without Red Hat commercial stuff, so sources will still be freely available, just not directly from Red Had, am I understanding it correctly?

No, CentOS is no longer a RHEL clone, but a beta version of stuff that goes into RHEL.

[–] manifex@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Is this a fork in the stream, then at this point?

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I can't be the only one who has no real interest in dealing with their developer program just to support their outdated distro.

[–] ar0177417@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

undefined> u will still have full access to source through their developer program or as a pa

Their developer plan is free