this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
24 points (85.3% liked)

Videos

14425 readers
171 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PHLAK@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Care to share a source on this? I'd like to know more.

[–] MalachiAzrael@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm guessing it's about this

https://old.reddit.com/r/CGPGrey2/comments/12hmeiy/cgp_grey_issues_2nd_copyright_strike_against/

TL;DR People who make reaction content should really get permission from the original creator.

[–] ShunkW@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, that's a courtesy, but if it falls under fair use, get over it. VTH videos are transformative, as he provides additional context, corrects inaccuracies, and more.

[–] Kaldo@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would the same argument work for movies, can I upload the entire Oppenheimer to youtube if I sometimes add an edit explaining some scenes or adding context, for example? Is that also transformative?

Cuz I don't mind react videos on their own, but the common issue is they basically re-upload the entire original video and people who watch that don't have to give views to the original. IMO react videos shouldn't contain more than 50% of the original.

[–] ShunkW@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I can see the argument about percentage. I'm really not sure. I think with this particular case, grey has millions of subscribers and I don't think VTH does. He's not stealing views from grey honestly.

It's tricky to define transformative for sure. At the end of the day, I think grey could have handled it better. He threw a hissy fit because he had received a strike before and decided to fuck over other, smaller creators out of spite.

[–] ShunkW@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

He filed against Vlogging Through History at least and a couple other history channels I don't watch. The strikes were reversed when CGPGrey didn't file suit after VTH appealed.

This is the only video YouTube search is giving me right now.

https://youtu.be/_PF8sZ6NUEk?si=8JnU9LqqC7zYV1gs