this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
697 points (96.8% liked)

Privacy

32130 readers
910 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I see a lot of people, including friends and family, sharing URLs rife with tracking parameters.

I feel alone in making sure that I'm sharing the cleanest possible URLs to others. For example, checking if the URLs are shortened to hide plenty of tracking params.

Just need to vent, thanks for reading.

Edit: adding some context for future references.

By using url tracking params, tech companies can track who shares the content and who clicks on that specific shared urls. A simple but effective tracking method.

Try sharing Instagram post or YouTube video from the apps.

Instagram adds 'igshid=' . YouTube adds 'si='.

If you share the same IG or YouTube content from different accounts. The 'igshid', 'si' value will be different.

This can be used to tag who shares it, and who clicks on that specific url param value.

TikTok hides a ton of such params behind shortened url. Try expanding tiktok shared urls.

If you use android, use this app to expand, analyze and clean up urls https://github.com/TrianguloY/UrlChecker

If you use Firefox (you should), install ublock origin and add this url tracking filter maintained by adguard: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AdguardTeam/FiltersRegistry/master/filters/filter_17_TrackParam/filter.txt

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That's part of my point. Most people just don't know.
That's like telling someone to just tune their carburator.

[–] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

inb4 you get an indignant reply suggesting that carburetor tuning is a must-have skill for absolutely anyone who owns anything that has one

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LOL, wait, is it copypasta or does that guy just post that a lot?

[–] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Yearly1845@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean carburetor tuning is a must-have skill for absolutely anyone who has one. Otherwise you can never be sure that you are getting an ideal fuel-air mixture, and the ratio changes over time with the temperature, humidity, seasons, etc. Really, it's irresponsible to not know how to do this if you have a car with a carburetor.

[–] Damage@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Brake line bleeding is a must-have skill for anyone with brakes. Otherwise you can never be sure not to have air in the brake lines. Really it's irresponsible not to know how to do this if you have a vehicle with idraulic brakes.

[–] psud@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or you can get your mechanic to do it. It's not like brakes get air bubbles during normal operation, it's only a risk when working on the brakes in any other way

(Was your comment a poke at the previous one, pointing out that one doesn't really need those skills? If so I think it's reasonable for a person with a carburettor vehicle to learn how to tune it, as the skills are becoming rare)

[–] _cnt0@unilem.org 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Being able to adjust your sarcasm detector is a must-have skill. Sarcasm levels fluctuate wildly depending on platform, community, season, and topic. Otherwise you can never know if you're making an ass of yourself when replying to other comments. Really, it's irresponsible to partake in social media without a finely tuned sarcasm detector.

[–] psud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I take it you missed my bracketed comment acknowledging it was probably sarcastic.

[–] _cnt0@unilem.org 2 points 1 year ago

I take it you missed that the "previous one" was also sarcasm.

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

LMFAO, I'm actually dying over here. 😂

[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)