this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
36 points (78.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7231 readers
43 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Sounds like bs to me. He had to waive laws to do this. And if he didn't do this what would happen? Would he get in trouble with the super president?

[–] prd@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like you a passionate about the topic, do some more reading do you can understand.

[–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So you can't tell me what's forcing the president to do this? What repercussions he'd face and from where?

[–] prd@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Don’t be lazy, if you care so much look it up. The other poster already explained it for you and you chose not to believe it.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

"President" is not "King"

Money is controlled by Republican Congress.

Republican Congress is not controlled by Democrat President.

[–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your inability to process information provided to you makes any discourse impractical.

[–] Hyggyldy@sffa.community 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cool. You feel better now that you've joined late and got a meaningless jab in? Got that dopamine hit?

[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Not defending it, since I'm not familiar enough with the topic, but he waived protections provided the laws - not the laws themselves, which must be within his power if he's done it.

[–] halvo317@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Waive laws? Lol. He would get impeached because that's breaking the law.