this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
881 points (100.0% liked)

196

16582 readers
1771 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Yes we do

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is much more of a theoretical argument than a practical one. If it's a city there will be children.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Children cannot give informed consent to sexual activities, so, that's accounted for.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What? You said fucking in public is okay as long as everyone consents, if children aren't capable of consenting, like you said, how is fucking in public okay?

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In general, it is not. That's what I mean. Anyone in the potential "audience" must be capable and willing to give informed consent to participate in a sexual act. If that condition cannot be met, the act is not ok.

ETA: My intent is to apply more generalized ethical reasoning to the situation. Sex in public is not, itself, fundamentally wrong; forcing others to participate in sexual acts without their consent is. This defuses avenues for kink shaming, sex-negativity, and other similar lines of reasoning.

[–] CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Semantics always annoy me unless I'm the one pointing them out