this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
217 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

34975 readers
115 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Faced with new laws in California and other states, big tech lobbyists want to sign a "Memorandum of Understanding" to prevent "a compliance market where lawyers drive the decisions."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZeroFox@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So what they're saying here is that it's cheaper for them to drag rtr laws to court everywhere for years than it is for them to make devices repairable. Or, in other terms, planned obsolescence makes them so much money that they can spend billions in lawyer fees and still make a profit.

[–] ZILtoid1991@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not really, a big driving factor behind making devices irreparable is to uphold the illusion of infinite growth.

[–] Dangdoggo@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup, or the Apple play which is just walk right around these regulations with some additional tricky bullshit while outwardly 'supporting' RtR. If I was a lawmaker I would be so fucking livid about this circumvention I would come back even harder but I guess I don't know a lot about that process.

[–] BobVersionFour@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Forgot something if you were a lawmaker you probably had so much money from those company that you would not care.

The goal here always been to make it look like they do something usefull not actually do it.

[–] somegadgetguy@lemdro.id 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's supremely disappointing, looking up campaign contributions, how little money is required to influence our politicians.

[–] BobVersionFour@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah at least make the corruption worth it but it's hard to up the price when the guy next to you would take a trip to Delaware to vote the way they want