this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
1150 points (97.5% liked)

Memes

45406 readers
775 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
1150
(lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lt_Cdr_Data@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I always thought the reason they don't take any action, is exactly because adblockers would then work as the guy above described.

Companies posting ads would eventually become aware, that a not insignificant portion of viewers don't even see the ads they are paying for. I don't see how this won't cause a backlash... i guess youtube calculated that in and thinks it'll be worth it any way.

[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good point, if you're counting ad impressions and billing accordingly then it's better to simply lose the impression than bill the customer for displaying a "ghost ad".

However this is exactly what's happening to sponsors with SponsorBlock, their section gets skipped and nobody knows (well, the channel owner knows from the watch stats, but does the sponsor demand those stats, do they only pay for clickthroughs on the referral link, I have no idea how the YT sponsor ecosystem works)

[–] Nahdahar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They don't need any other information than referral link clicks/signups and video views, one of which they have metrics on, the other is public information. A SponsorSkip user is equal in their eyes to a person who isn't interested in the product.