this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
218 points (97.8% liked)

Work Reform

9891 readers
519 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's ficked that there's even a "replacement level" in the first place

That's so fucking dystopian

[–] FearTheCron@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a complex subject that deserves legitimate scientific study. There are known detrimental effects of low fertility rates in a country, but they often take a long time to manifest. However, there are also many examples of horrific consequences of governments trying to affect fertility rate.

[–] akira@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if you can have a baby by buying bottom shelve food products for the last week of a month, what happens if you get twins

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I have A Modest Proposal which may help with both problems at once.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm trying to think of a real world example of government breeding growth that's gone wrong, but I can't think of any.

There's plenty of examples of breeding control that have gone horrific of course. I just can't think of the opposite example.

[–] solstice@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

..It's a really super basic entry level concept in understanding demographics and populations, plus economics, human geography, migration trends, society in general, etc. There's nothing dystopian about it. (Arguably, the fact that people instantly think such studies are dystopic is itself dystopic.)

[–] grissee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

it's pretty simple actually, 2.1, a pair to make baby + 0.1 for unforeseen circumstance