this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
922 points (97.9% liked)

Greentext

4149 readers
1692 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure it's nonsense

Maybe, maybe not. More research is needed.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817779/

Nevertheless, human studies investigating the effect of artificial sweeteners on hunger-satiety cycle, via SCFA, are currently lacking.

[โ€“] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 11 months ago

There are also artificial sweeteners that are toxic to dogs even in small quantities, but humans can eat them all day with no ill effects. And it's not about body mass either, because humans might be say 2x the body mass of a dog, but we can eat 10 times the quantity and be fine.

Saying that a particular compound has an effect in laboratory test animals isn't really anywhere close to saying that it might be the same in humans, there is plenty of precedents to be said that it probably won't work like that.