this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
274 points (99.3% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3198 readers
1 users here now

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 66 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Staccato@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A gallon of gas contains 33.7 kWh of energy.

ICE sedans get on average 31.7 miles per gallon, which is 0.94 miles per kWh.

Most electric SUVs get 3-4 miles per kWh depending on temperature and driving conditions. Electric sedans get 4-5 miles per kWh.

You may generally dislike SUVs, but those Electric SUVs are still a far cry better than the gas sedans you're giving a pass.

[–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Your mixing of miles and metric is triggering my FauxCD.

[–] orphiebaby@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

"fauxCD"

Stealing that. A big pet peeve of mine is the hijacking of the term "OCD" by almost everyone so they can use it incorrectly, and then people with an actual panic disorder aren't taken seriously.

[–] Staccato@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Should I give it in terms of inverse Newtons, squared seconds per kilogram-meter? That would be a proper SI reduction for ya :P

[–] set_secret@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

ikr I'm angry but also happy they're at least trying unlike most Americans

[–] Staccato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Don't give me that much credit I'm just reading the units of measure the car gives me

[–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Americans have actually been using metric for a long time. Well, their drug dealers have anyway.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Yes but they’re still as butt ugly as the rest of the SUVs they’re making. And they don’t handle well. And they’re fucking huge.

[–] diomnep@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have one of these and it is not an SUV at all. It is a hatchback that is a foot shorter than a Honda accord and only 7” taller.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So it’s a hatchback with a high CoG and poor handling?

Sounds like an SUV to me.

[–] diomnep@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not sure where you’re getting the poor handling or the high CoG from. It has a low CoG because the battery components are installed near the bottom and they make up a large percentage of the car’s weight.

It also handles quite well, mostly thanks to the low CoG. It feels firmly planted and is very nimble in turns. Sure, it’s not an e46 M3 but it would be crazy to expect that.

It also sounds to me like you don’t actually even know what an SUV is. I know it seems crazy but there’s no requirement to comment if you’re uninformed on a subject and aren’t capable of adding value to the discussion.

[–] 1847953620@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Looks like kinda like an suv, at least. Why did they make it so tall? what's with the SUV-like shape?