this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
1683 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59657 readers
2871 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But there is profit in it. Public transit can be a revenue generator that at least pays for itself as opposed to roads that are nothing but a huge cost over its lifetime.

And then there are the second-order effects of better economic activity in the areas around metro stations, a healthier populace that is less of a burden on the healthcare system, and overall higher happiness, which makes for better workers. It's just that it can take a decade or two to see these effects come to fruition.

But politicians rarely see that far out.

[–] nexusband@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not how the calculations for streets work. National economy is pretty darn complex and streets are paying for itself in a lot of countries.

[–] Gabu@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Source: Trust me bro.

Public transit literally pays for itself, no "darn complex" calculation required.